The Arizona Army National Guard stands with roughly 84 percent of its military personnel complying with Big Army’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate as the Army’s June 30 deadline for 100 percent compliance approaches.
“Out of approximately 5,000 Soldiers, the Arizona Army National Guard has 119 COVID-19 vaccination refusals,” said Maj. Kyle Key, the communications director for the Arizona National Guard.
“No separation boards for refusals have been scheduled at this time,” Key said.
The major said the information is not up-to-the-minute correct but has not changed much since the last survey of the force.
A spokesman for the National Guard Bureau in Washington told The Arizona Sun Times and The Star News Network that the entire Army National Guard force of approximately 440,000 guardsmen was 86 percent compliant with the vaccine mandate as of June 27.
Key said his state’s guard is also processing requests for dispensation from the vax mandate.
“We currently have 310 religious accommodation requests and four medical exemption requests,” he said.
“Soldiers who have applied for either religious accommodations or medical exemptions may continue to serve and train while their requests are being adjudicated even after the June 30 deadline,” he said. “Each request will be reviewed individually as we ensure their rights for a fair and exhaustive exemption process.”
In a Dec. 16 statement on Big Army’s vaccination mandate, Secretary of the Army Christine Wormuth said she was committed to the mandate she imposed Sept. 14.
“Vaccinating our Soldiers against COVID-19 is first and foremost about Army readiness,” she said.
“To those who continue to refuse the vaccine and are not pending a final decision on a medical or administrative exemption, I strongly encourage you to get the vaccine. If not, we will begin involuntary separation proceedings,” she said.
Beyond exemptions for religious or medical reasons, the only other exemption is allowed for soldiers separating or retiring from the Army before July 1.
– – –
Neil W. McCabe is the national political editor of The Star News Network based in Washington. He is an Army Reserve public affairs NCO and an Iraq War veteran. Send him news tips: [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter, TruthSocial & GETTR: @ReporterMcCabe
Photo “Arizona National Guard” by Arizona National Guard.
Greetings,
Not sure if you’re aware but the injections of the experimental mRNA technology dubbed vaccines are a legal under the Nuremberg Code for the military.
Now, the CDC at one time gave out some pretty confusing information about the current mRNA shots and Pfizer’s licensed Comirnaty vaccine. However, over time it was realized that the Comirnaty vaccine was different than the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) given by the FDA. What the problem became was that Pfizer had not developed the Comirnaty vaccine.
This meant that everyone not just including the military was subject to an experimental vaccine. The FDA EUA letter to the pharmaceutical companies for these shots use the term investigational. If you look at the meeting of terms on the FDA and CDC’s website you see that the term investigational means experimental.
Furthermore and what is the biggest issue here is that Pfizer literally had no intentions of developing the Comirnaty vaccine. See CDC URL: Preview Posting of COVID-19 Vaccine Codes and Crosswalk for Currently Authorized Vaccines and Anticipation of Potential Vaccine Availability under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) – https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/COVID-19-related-codes.html
Article:
Pfizer Quietly Admits it Will NEVER Manufacture the Vaccine that was FDA Approved – Will Produce New “Tris-Sucrose Formulation” mRNA Vaccine Instead
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/pfizer-quietly-admits-will-never-manufacture-vaccine-fda-approved-will-produce-new-tris-sucrose-formulation-mrna-vaccine-instead/
I hope that this information is helpful because what the federal government is doing appears to be illegal.